Seeing Ourselves in Joni Mitchell

Books & the Arts

/
June 11, 2024

Seeing Ourselves in Joni Mitchell

Ann Powers’s deeply personal biography of Joni Mitchell looks at how a generation of listeners came to identify with the folk singer’s intimate songs.

David Hajdu

Ad Policy

Joni Mitchell being interviewed in 1972 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

(Photo by Gijsbert Hanekroot / Redferns)

“Traveling in some vehicle, sitting in some cafe,” Joni Mitchell established a mise en scène of restless contemplation in the title song of her 1976 jazz-folk album Hejira. Finding transitory comfort in a state of melancholy, she sings, “I see something of myself in everyone just at this moment of the world.” 

Books in review

Traveling: On the Path of Joni Mitchell


by Ann Powers

Buy this book

Identification with the general public has not been a major theme of the 200 or so songs Mitchell has released since 1968. Her career hasn’t served as a model for the Taylor Swift scheme of songwriting as fan service, wherein the songs feel like photoshopped selfies of the people listening to them. Mitchell’s, by contrast, have directed her audience’s attention elsewhere: She has aimed for an identification with her, an inversion of the social physics of seeing yourself in others. Mitchell’s songs, deeply and poetically personal, offer a richness of meticulous particulars that, with no pandering or exaggeration, work through universal feelings. “If you see me in my songs and wonder about my life, then I’m not doing a good job,” Mitchell once said, as the critic Ann Powers quotes her in her intricately probing new book, Traveling: On the Path of Joni Mitchell. “If you see yourself, then I’m doing what I was meant to do.”

The driving idea of Powers’s book is that the author, a longtime music writer held in high esteem for her critical journalism (for The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times and in her current perch as the music critic at NPR) and books (on artists and subjects as varied as Kate Bush, American bohemia, and the sexual currents in pop music), sees more than a little of herself in Joni Mitchell. It’s a view Powers came to over time, after years of listening to and thinking about Mitchell’s music and researching her life through interviews with many of her famous contemporaries, rivals, collaborators, and lovers, some of whom—such as James Taylor, Leonard Cohen, Graham Nash, and David Crosby—played all four of those roles in the overlapping circle game of Mitchell’s career. Powers came to relate to Mitchell in multiple ways: as the only daughter of middle-class parents inclined to uncertainty, as a woman redefined by adoption (Mitchell having given up a baby for adoption, Powers a mother through adoption), as a woman asserting herself in a sphere dominated by men, and as a cerebral adventurer who resisted reductive classification.

“As I listen to Joni’s songs that touch on childhood,” Powers writes, “the two kids who play hide-and-seek within them—the pretty, carefree waif picking off the petals on a flowering weed and the red-faced troublemaker yelling at her mother in the doorway—stop what they’re doing and turn to look at me. Yes, I recognize them. They live, in other versions, within me.”

A bit later in the book, in a section on Mitchell’s circuitous navigation through the music world, she reflects, “Why would a woman want to be the odd one out in a boy’s world? Well, power, obviously. The power of having been designated the exception. I have experienced this myself many times as a music writer coming up in various rock undergrounds.”

Conceptually, then, Traveling belongs in the small but slowly growing family of ruminative biographies by authors who take up biographical subjects along with their biographer selves as secondary subjects, illuminating the objects of their inquiry by reflecting upon them while considering the ways they as authors reflect aspects of the lives they’re writing about. The biographer Kathryn J. Abajian, in her study of the mid-century painter Ella Peacock, First Sight of the Desert, drew parallels between Peacock’s and her own stagnation in marriage and its damage to her work. Olivia Laing’s To the River: A Journey Beneath the Surface examined Virginia Woolf by tracing the path of the Ouse river, in which Woolf died, and mapping it against the courses in her own path as a biographer. Adding one more element of biographical intersection, Ada Calhoun took up three entwined subjects: herself, her father (the writer Peter Schjedahl), and his early artistic idol in Also a Poet: Frank O’Hara, My Father, and Me. Of course, it has long been a trope of the biographical art that all biographers are ultimately, if unknowingly, writing about themselves. Authors overtly addressing both their subjects and themselves are at least clear about what they’re up to.

Current Issue


June 2024 Issue

As the title suggests, Traveling is largely about the taking of journeys—and not only literal travels, in the serpentine course of Mitchell’s life from her childhood in the snowy environs of Saskatoon, Canada, through important visits to Greenwich Village and Coconut Grove, Florida, to the communes of Laurel Canyon that defined Mitchell for a while (and which Mitchell, in turn, defined) to the tonier, hissing lawns of Los Angeles, which she ended up, finally, calling home. In Powers’s framing, Mitchell’s work has been a product of intellectual, emotional, and social traveling that maps loosely over the course of her physical vagabonding. “Your life becomes a travelogue full of picture postcard charms,” Mitchell sings in “Amelia,” a paean to the lost hero of early aviation and the temptations of her own wanderlust, from Hejira. The title for that album was derived from the Arabic term for Muhammad’s journey out of Mecca to Medina, marking the beginning of the Islamic era. Mitchell found the word in a dictionary, Powers tells us, and embraced its translation to “pilgrimage.” Once again, Powers employs a biographical trope, the life as a journey. But she sets it up mainly to complicate it, and avoids reducing places to picture postcards.

Mitchell made what constitutes a pilgrimage to Greenwich Village in her first years as a folk-ish songwriter and singer clearly emulating her predecessor, the “folk queen” Joan Baez. She didn’t let herself get subsumed by the cutthroat bohemianism of the Washington Square careerists, though; there was “just too much game there, all the energy spent on feeling immortally important,” Powers writes. Mitchell left the Village and took a less-traveled path to its southern Florida approximation in Coconut Grove, a tourist-brochure collage of tiki bars, Cuban dance clubs, and coffee houses. Mitchell connected meaningfully there with David Crosby, recently cast out from the Byrds, through a lesser-known musician named Bobby Ingram. In her pilgrimage to the various sites of Mitchell’s travels, Powers tracked down Ingram, still living in the Grove.

Powers has a sharp eye for detail and a lyric-lover’s appreciation for concision; the passage describing her visit to Ingram is just one of many tight, vivid narrative playlets in her book. She drove through “the thick weave of palm trees encroaching the bungalow,” and entered “through a storm-sturdy wooden door” to find Ingram waiting. He “sat in the enclosed porch off the living room, surrounded by knicknacks. White thatchy hair, rumpled plaid shirt, big smile; he was settling into the remembering phase of his life.”

Here and throughout her smart, exquisitely crafted book, Powers takes what her sources told her and filters it discriminately through her deep knowledge of Mitchell’s life and work, American musical culture, and popular culture more broadly. She never lets an inflated claim float unpunctured and declines to tell an over-told tale one more time. Ingram, for instance, launched into an account of how Mitchell’s beauty and charm had gotten Crosby all weak in the knees. “This part of our conversation didn’t really interest me,” Powers writes. “Crosby had been dining out on his tale of being run over by Mitchell’s charisma at the Gaslight for so many years he could have opened his own Joni-themed restaurant.” (Just a few months before Crosby died early last year, I interviewed him myself by phone; the subject was the Beatles’ influence on the Byrds, and he found a way to work in how he had “discovered” Joni Mitchell.) More intriguing to Powers was “the musical openness of that time and place”—a free, expansive approach to creativity that Mitchell relished and carried into the ever more expansive music she would come to make.

Ad Policy

Readers of Traveling should expect careful unraveling of the layers of meaning and effect in Joni Mitchell’s music, and they’ll get it. Powers devotes four full pages to “River,” a song on Mitchell’s most beloved album, Blue, without an excess adjective. “Its core of cool, formed by the lipid melody and floating rhythm and a chorus built around the hushed word ‘wish,’ prevents full immersion in any one emotion,” Powers argues. “‘River’ resists catharsis, even resolution. It takes up the problem of sadness, instead of creating a comfortable place for it.” Powers understands the way the music works—how the “tight circle of a melody” and simple chord changes, “restrained by a stern quarter note,” conjure a biting kind of sadness—and how the evocation of such feelings in the setting of Christmastime works as a demand for “the right to negative emotions.” Not since David Yaffe’s musically acute biography, Restless Daughter, has a writer taken on Joni Mitchell’s intricate and cryptic songs with such surety.

Powers is especially strong on the music most in need of clearheaded reconsideration: the jazz-fusion albums Mitchell made in the late 1970s (Don Juan’s Reckless Daughter and Mingus) and the string of synthesizer-heavy experimental pop records that followed in the ’80s, after she signed with her manager’s new company, Geffen Records, and found a new collaborator and husband, the multi-instrumentalist Larry Klein (Wild Things Run Fast, Dog Eat Dog, and Chalk Mark in a Rain Storm). Powers casts the former in fresh context, pointing out that Mitchell’s peers in Black pop, such as Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gaye, employed elements of fusion at the same time without being chastised for overreaching, as Mitchell was. And she gives the bouncy electronic records Mitchell made in collaboration with Klein their due as infectious products of a (mostly) happy time in Mitchell’s romantic life. “She experimented with pastiche, electronic manipulation and a vocal style grounded in something very different from the acrobatic virtuosity of her youth,” Powers allows. “She was immersed in new processes alongside her partner, a mutual promise to create, create, create.”

Popular

“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →

What’s the Deal With Manhattan’s Pencil-Thin High Rises?

What’s the Deal With Manhattan’s Pencil-Thin High Rises?

Can the “OG Organizer” Keep Biden in the White House?

Can the “OG Organizer” Keep Biden in the White House?

Feature

/

Joan Walsh

The Enigma of Frantz Fanon

The Enigma of Frantz Fanon

India’s Elections Shocked the World. They Shouldn’t Have.

India’s Elections Shocked the World. They Shouldn’t Have.

Arvin Alaigh

When Mitchell was stricken by a brain aneurysm in 2015, the long-term impact on her ability to create was unclear. It took more than seven years of medical attention, support from her many friends and fans, and sheer will for Mitchell to recover well enough to reappear in public and perform in steely, halting triumph at the 2022 Newport Folk Festival. Made possible through the ardent dedication of Mitchell’s mentee Brandi Carlile, the Newport show was recorded for a 2023 album that earned a Grammy and led to Mitchell’s grand comeback appearance on the award broadcast earlier this year, performing “Both Sides Now” on a resplendent throne. Powers, like her fellow Joni scholar Michelle Mercer, found something about Mitchell’s reemergence discomforting, and I have found it unsettling too. “The aneurysm, escalating the inevitable decline of aging, had changed her,” Powers writes in the final pages of Traveling. “The new, soft face she was showing the world disconcerted me.”

After years of seeing something of ourselves in Joni Mitchell, it’s not easy to watch her today and see a reminder of our own fragility.

Keep Reading

Dear reader,

I hope you enjoyed the article you just read. It’s just one of the many deeply-reported and boundary-pushing stories we publish everyday at The Nation. In a time of continued erosion of our fundamental rights and urgent global struggles for peace, independent journalism is now more vital than ever.

As a Nation reader, you are likely an engaged progressive who is passionate about bold ideas. I know I can count on you to help sustain our mission-driven journalism.

This month, we’re kicking off an ambitious Summer Fundraising Campaign with the goal of raising $15,000. With your support, we can continue to produce the hard-hitting journalism you rely on to cut through the noise of conservative, corporate media. Please, donate today.

A better world is out there—and we need your support to reach it.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

David Hajdu

David Hajdu is the music critic of The Nation and a professor at Columbia University.

More from The Nation

Has NY Governor Kathy Hochul Killed Congestion Pricing For Good?

Has NY Governor Kathy Hochul Killed Congestion Pricing For Good?

Or just until after the election? Either way, she’s blown a $15 billion hole in the MTA budget, leaving New Yorkers with overcrowded streets, filthy air, and an underfunded subwa…

Ross Barkan

Transphobia Spreads in a “Haven” for LGBTQ Youth

Transphobia Spreads in a “Haven” for LGBTQ Youth

For young people in Massachusetts facing queer- and transphobia, the statehouse feels very far away.

Comment

/

Emmet Fraizer

Why Did a Progressive Pope Use a Gay Slur?

Why Did a Progressive Pope Use a Gay Slur?

Given Francis’s apparent embrace of LGBTQ people, many found his use of the offensive term frociaggine confounding—blame fragile masculinity.

Michael F. Pettinger

The Supreme Court Could Make Encampment Sweeps Even More Dangerous

The Supreme Court Could Make Encampment Sweeps Even More Dangerous

Unhoused people face significant health risks from encampment sweeps. Grants Pass v. Johnson threatens to make them much more common.

Why Plutocrats Are Rallying to Trump

Why Plutocrats Are Rallying to Trump

Civic lessons won’t sway America’s oligarchs. Instead, we need forthright economic populism to bring them to heel.

Jeet Heer

India’s Elections Shocked the World. They Shouldn’t Have.

India’s Elections Shocked the World. They Shouldn’t Have.

The roots of the revolt against Narendra Modi’s government were visible to anyone who cared to look.

Arvin Alaigh