/
August 18, 2023
Jewish Women Have a Long History of Organizing for Labor Rights
Fran Drescher is just the latest example of the pivotal role Jewish women have played in the union struggle.
SAG-AFTRA President Fran Drescher speaks at a New York City Council hearing press conference at City Hall Park on August 1, 2023, in New York City. (Photo by NDZ / Star Max / GC Images)
This article appears in the September 4/11, 2023 issue.
Fran Drescher, the president of SAG-AFTRA, stole the show—and Hollywood’s lunch—when she announced the largest strike by the union of entertainment and media workers since 1960. That unmistakable voice pierced through the corporate pablum with the kind of no-bullshit moral clarity we’ve come to identify with the most famous democratic socialist in America, Bernie Sanders, or the once-highest-paid woman on TV, Judge Judy. It wasn’t just the strength of her words but the Yiddish-inflected cadence that has reverberated through more than a century of the American labor movement. Jewish women are inextricable from the history of labor rights; there’s nothing “unlikely” about the fact that Drescher has taken her place in it. The only shock is how little that history is acknowledged in mainstream discourse or on the contemporary left, where supporters seem eager to identify the virtues of socialist ideas and achievements but slow to claim the role of Jews in their formation.
Take International Women’s Day (IWD). Every year on March 8 there’s a flurry of Twitter activity from accounts marked with red rose emojis correctly pointing out the socialist origins of the holiday. Although some of the historical details are murky, such as which exact strike the day commemorates, what’s crystal clear is the role that Jewish garment workers like Theresa Malkiel played in codifying it. Malkiel proposed establishing a National Women’s Day in 1909, the year of the Uprising of the 20,000, the largest strike of women garment workers ever. The 11-week strike supercharged the labor movement in the period before the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, which helped revolutionize workers’ rights in America. Its organizers, ardent unionists like Clara Lemlich, Rose Schneiderman, and Pauline Newman, rallied their troops—predominantly young Jewish immigrant women and girls like themselves—in the language they knew best: Yiddish. Significant numbers of Italian women and girls joined in too, but as the historian David Von Drehle notes, having fled poverty rather than pogroms, Italian workers held out some hope of returning home—an option unavailable to their Jewish counterparts. Jewish immigration from the Pale of Settlement to the United States nearly quadrupled between 1910 and 1924 to 4 million, and the newcomers had the chutzpah to fight back against unfettered capitalism. Sick of these ungrateful, reactive racial inferiors, the American ruling class—no, it did not consider Jews white—shifted US policy to exclude them by passing the 1924 Immigration Act. In addition to completely barring most immigrants from Asia, the law restricted entry from eastern and southern Europe to 2 percent of those countries’ representation in the US as of the 1890 census—well before the mass migration of Jews to America. It was actually easier to get into the United States from Mexico than from Poland. Nevertheless, Jews continued to organize and agitate for better working conditions, and Jewish women in particular fought a decades-long battle for formal recognition within the labor movement.
And yet you’d be hard-pressed to find Jewish women celebrated in online mentions of IWD or in any of the attendant media coverage about the history of labor rights. Even a recent story in The New York Times about a memorial to the victims of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire referred only to “immigrant women,” as if the fact that most of them were Jewish were irrelevant to their circumstances.
The same is true of the media commentary on the film Oppenheimer that fails to point out that the physicist enlisted to end the war against the Nazis was the child of German Jewish immigrants. It’s not entirely surprising though, since the film itself barely scratches the surface of his Jewishness, either as a source of the discrimination he was subjected to or as a source of his motivations, let alone the fact that 90 percent of the physicists who worked on the atomic bomb were Jewish and maybe that’s kind of important to understanding their experience? But it’s truly striking to see how those who focus on representation also completely overlooked that fact, even while making arguments about other areas where the film fell short. A story that ran on NBC News’ website, for example, called attention to the erasure of the Japanese experience while itself erasing Oppenheimer’s identity. If representation matters, why doesn’t it matter for Jews?
This lack of visibility of Jews in the mainstream mirrors their hyper-visibility and vilification on the right. In some ways, it may be a kind of weird, even well-intentioned, overcorrection to it. Regardless, the effect is nullification, creating a schizoid situation in which we’re constantly fighting over the facts of our existence. And facts matter. The fact that Oppenheimer and Drescher are Jewish isn’t incidental but foundational to understanding them within the moral and historical context of their work.
Drescher invoked the connection directly in a July live-stream event with Sanders. In a comment that perhaps reveals more about her worldview than any of those viral video clips, she recounts a realization she had as she sat opposite a Jewish man at the negotiation table: “I looked at a guy who obviously was religious and took off for Shabbat and whatever, and I’m thinking maybe he’s a great family man, maybe he makes donations, maybe he supports his community. But his job is to screw me and my members, and…that’s kind of compartmentalizing. You got to be consistent in your life with how you act, how you treat other people.” What exactly is the conflict here? For Drescher, it’s that being anti-labor is fundamentally not Jewish. That’s what makes watching people sanitize Drescher’s loud and proud legacy so distressing, even when she’s being praised by a colleague: “Her speech pattern, her tone, her unfiltered zest—when she spoke, the entire room shook. They were not ready for that strong, female, powerful, East Coast sound.”
Bubbela, they don’t talk like that in Connecticut. It’s called a working-class New York Jewish accent.
Alexis Grenell
Alexis Grenell is a columnist for The Nation. She is a political consultant who writes frequently about gender and politics.
More from The Nation
The Planet Is Only Getting Hotter
The Planet Is Only Getting Hotter
We can’t keep being the human beings who live to destroy.
Air Quality?
Air Quality?
Climate change is burning our planet.
The Global South’s BRICS Play Should Not Be Dismissed
The Global South’s BRICS Play Should Not Be Dismissed
The expansion of the BRICS agenda indicates a hunger for countering the serious shortcomings of the US-led global order.
In Defeating the August 1991 Coup, Russians Won—and Then Lost—Democracy
In Defeating the August 1991 Coup, Russians Won—and Then Lost—Democracy
Will young people continue fighting for freedom?
Ohio Voters Protected Their Last Shot at Representative Democracy
Ohio Voters Protected Their Last Shot at Representative Democracy
The defeat of Issue 1 is an unequivocal sign that Ohioans understood the connection between democracy and abortion—and that enthusiasm for abortion rights has not waned in the wak…
Trump’s (Still) the One
Trump’s (Still) the One
Despite the Georgia indictments—and all his other legal troubles—Democrats are still going to have to beat him next November.