National Abortion Rights Groups Have the Wrong Priorities For Our Movement

Activism

/
August 7, 2024

National Abortion Rights Groups Have the Wrong Priorities for Our Movement

There is an alarming disconnect between the agenda of our most powerful organizations and the real needs of abortion seekers and providers on the ground.

Chelsea Williams-Diggs et. al

Ad Policy

Reproductive justice demonstrators outside the US Supreme Court Building on Tuesday, March 26, 2024.

(Valerie Plesch / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

This piece was written and signed by a collective of abortion fund representatives. You can see the full list of writers and signatories at the bottom of the piece.

Two years after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, the crisis of abortion access in America has reached a breaking point.

At the same time, Democrats are making abortion a central issue in their election-year campaigns, and their allies at well-funded national reproductive rights and health non-profit organizations invest millions in vague, multi-year electoral strategies. 

As representatives of local abortion funds across the country, we of course support any political efforts to expand abortion access in the future. But we also want to pose this question to the elite sectors of our movement: where is your strategy to increase abortion care right now, when it has never been needed more?

Local abortion funds from across the country are eager to share their perspectives and expertise on the challenges of funding abortion in their area, and the frustrations that are brought on by the failure of national reproductive health, rights, and access organizations to attend to the needs of so many pregnant people on the ground.

There is an alarming disconnect between abortion funds, grassroots organizations that are actually providing access to abortion, and large national organizations that are advocating for access.

Local abortion funds were founded as a direct result of the shortcomings of Roe v Wade, which, though it ensured a basic right to some abortion care, enshrined a limited framework that proved vulnerable to conservative assaults long before Dobbs. Abortion funds created a bridge between the theoretical right to an abortion and the real-world ability to access that right for the most marginalized. Local funds know their unique community needs best and work tirelessly to meet them through case management, emotional support, arranging travel and logistical support, and directly covering the costs of abortion care. Unlike national funds, most local funds have no client requirements or restrictions–such as around gestational age or income–and trust the people who seek their help as the experts in their own lives. 

Since the Dobbs decision, and subsequent enforcement of extremely restrictive state laws, local funds have used their decades-long expertise, deep relationships, and infrastructure to collectively meet this moment of crisis and support the growing number of people struggling to access abortion. This is despite skyrocketing travel and appointment costs. For the Kentucky Health Justice Network, travel costs have grown by over 500% since Dobbs. While the expenses, misinformation, and fear tactics continue to rise, local abortion funds have doubled down on their commitment to supporting their callers, no matter what.

Current Issue


August 2024 Issue

By contrast, some national funds with resources that our organizations could only dream of are making it harder, not easier, to get abortion care.  In June, for instance, the National Abortion Federation (NAF) announced that it would be cutting back on the amount it gives people who qualify for its financial assistance program. Where the NAF previously paid for 50 percent of the cost of care, it will now pay for just 30 percent, with no exceptions for exceptionally high abortion prices later in pregnancy. For example, an abortion seeker in Nevada who qualifies for NAF assistance will now be responsible for $1,330 of their $1,900 procedure. This is a significant change from the $800 they would be responsible for under the previous NAF funding parameter. Planned Parenthood also announced similar cuts to its Justice Fund program.

These groups blamed their decision on budget constraints, but their resources dwarf anything local funds can provide. For instance, Planned Parenthood received $275 million in 2022 from just one donor.  Every budget is a reflection of priorities. The choice of these well-funded, national organizations to drastically deprioritize their assistance will be felt by abortion seekers and their local abortion funds who will be called upon to bridge a much larger funding gap on tightening budgets. Local and regional abortion funds are often underfunded, understaffed, or volunteer-led. This decision will spread them even thinner, and make accessing abortion care even more difficult.

Then, on Tuesday, June 25th, the newly-formed Abortion Access Now coalition held a celebration to announce its not-so-new plan to advocate for abortion access in the next decade (not “now” as the name suggests). During this launch, which we watched live, one of the speakers went so far as to say that national groups were the ones holding together the gaps in access since the Dobbs decision. This statement is not only incorrect, but an erasure of the work of local abortion funds that have been coordinating access for individuals across the country despite increasingly hostile conditions. 

But while the statement was offensive, it was also a telling encapsulation of the warped perspectives and priorities of the most powerful groups in our movement.  The national organizations that comprise the Abortion Access Now coalition fundraise endlessly, siphon support from institutional funders and grassroots donors, capitalize on the Dobbs rage donations, and funnel that money into campaign bank accounts. These groups already largely operate hundreds of million-dollar budgets. This is all being done with the promise that this time they’ll be successful in getting their ducks in a row in Congress and repealing the Hyde Amendment. It’s a great idea (and one that abortion funds also dream of), but this campaign is a gross abuse of funding and publicity that deprioritizes actual access to abortion care right now

Abortion funds exist because governmental and political systems have failed our communities—primarily Black, Indigenous and Native, immigrant, rural, and low-income—and abandoned us in times of need. It is disheartening to be engaged in this work and, in moments of political crisis, to witness groups that should be our partners in the fight—uplifting, investing in, and centering our expertise and critical role—fail us, too. In a larger reproductive justice ecosystem where we should all be working together to create community systems to affect change at all levels, this “new” campaign is just more of the same. 

There is clearly a misalignment in values between mainstream, national nonprofits and local abortion funds. We’ve frustratingly watched them support outdated calls to “restore Roe,” actively lobby against expanding legal protections to abortion pills by mail, and minimize the importance of expanded access to abortions later in pregnancy. The vision of reproductive freedom must come from those most directly impacted rather than the same few out-of-touch legacy organizations with more wealth than all abortion funds combined. We must answer the call of Reproductive Justice, a Black feminist framework, which teaches us that this work must center the most impacted and those rooted in the communities they are a part of. Reproductive freedom is a fundamental human right, and people cannot and will not wait for laws to change—especially over the course of a decade—to exercise that right.  In communities like those supported by abortion funds across the country, the work of reproductive freedom is already happening. Without prioritizing material support for abortion seekers, we are putting pregnant people at risk and failing to live up to our movement’s mandate.

Ad Policy

Popular

“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →

National Abortion Rights Groups Have the Wrong Priorities for Our Movement

National Abortion Rights Groups Have the Wrong Priorities for Our Movement

Chelsea Williams-Diggs et. al

Tim Walz Brings the Democratic Ticket Back to the Party’s Roots

Tim Walz Brings the Democratic Ticket Back to the Party’s Roots

Chris Lehmann

This Bill Aims to Strip Trump’s Immunity—and the Supreme Court’s Power

This Bill Aims to Strip Trump’s Immunity—and the Supreme Court’s Power

Elie Mystal

Why Walz Won

Why Walz Won

John Nichols

Donations to local funds have dwindled and support from Planned Parenthood, NAF, and institutional organizations have retreated. Local funds have been put in a position to disproportionately hold the weight of abortion access while being abandoned based on their more radical and staunch values than their national counterparts. Local abortion funds are the experts in this political moment and deserve respect and investment. Without the ability of those at the grassroots to sustainably do their work, the already fragile abortion access landscape is at risk, and abortion seekers are positioned to lose the most. Now is not the time to put policy advocacy and wealth hoarding over material support. Now is the time to dig deeper into the work that is happening in our communities.

In order to most directly support abortion seekers now, donate directly to your local abortion fund to ensure that your donation gets to abortion seekers, and realizes abortion access right NOW. 

Written by:

Tyler Barbarin, Louisiana Abortion Fund

Macy Haverda, Wild West Access Fund of Nevada

Kris Lawler, Tampa Bay Abortion Fund

Josie Pinto, Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire

Destini Spaeth, Prairie Abortion Fund

Savannah Trebuna, Kentucky Health Justice Network

Chelsea Williams-Diggs, New York Abortion Access Fund

Signatories:

ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE

Abortion Fund of Arizona

Abortion Fund of Ohio

Abortion Freedom Fund

Abortion Liberation Fund of PA

Abortion Rights Fund of Western MA

Carolina Abortion Fund

Cascades Abortion Support Collective

Cobalt Abortion Fund

DC Abortion Fund

Eastern Massachusetts Abortion (EMA) Fund

Emergency Medical Assistance

Florida Access Network

Frontera Fund

Fund Texas Choice

Holler Health Justice

Indigenous Women Rising

Jane’s Due Process

Justice Empowerment Network (JEN)

Kentucky Health Justice Network

Louisiana Abortion Fund

Midwest Access Coalition

Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund

Montana Abortion Access Program

New York Abortion Access Fund

Prairie Abortion Fund

Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire

Richmond Reproductive Freedom Project

SYS Fund with The Afiya Center

Tampa Bay Abortion Fund

Tides for Reproductive Freedom

Utah Abortion Fund

West Fund

Wild West Access Fund of Nevada

Keep Reading

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,

The Editors of The Nation

Chelsea Williams-Diggs et. al

More from The Nation

Cori Bush May Have Lost an Election, But She Won the Moral High Ground

Cori Bush May Have Lost an Election, But She Won the Moral High Ground

The Missouri Democrat was among the first to call for a ceasefire in Gaza, and there can be no disputing that she stood on the right side of history.

John Nichols

The US Military Is Still Not Taking Suicide Prevention Seriously

The US Military Is Still Not Taking Suicide Prevention Seriously

The unanticipated toll of suicides by troops and veterans has become another Pentagon failure.

Nick Turse

Artists Uplift and Celebrate in Harlem

Artists Uplift and Celebrate in Harlem

The GrandScale Mural Project on 125th Street.

OppArt

/

Evan Bishop

Gina Raimondo Would Be a Terrible Choice for Treasury Secretary

Gina Raimondo Would Be a Terrible Choice for Treasury Secretary

The commerce secretary is rumored to be the front-runner to head the Treasury Department in a Harris administration. Her coziness with corporations makes her a disastrous pick.

Branko Marcetic

Kamala Harris and the Cool Dad Next Door

Kamala Harris and the Cool Dad Next Door

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz rounds out the Democratic ticket. Can he keep up his affable persona as tensions rise in the Middle East?

Alyssa Oursler

The Misunderstood Art of Marie Laurencin

The Misunderstood Art of Marie Laurencin

Her lively, outré, and undeniably feminine take on cubism set her apart from her modernist peers.